Mario Gonzalez marked it as to-read Oct 09, Frank Spencer marked it as to-read Jan 23, Karwan added it May 05, Murat added it Jun 20, Winter marked it as to-read Mar 03, Michael Mcdonough marked it as to-read Aug 01, Sera Schwarz added it Dec 02, Shu marked it as to-read Jan 20, Renan Virginio marked it as to-read Jul 07, Anders S. David O'Dwyer marked it as to-read Mar 02, Ivan added it Mar 12, Toffifer marked it as to-read Apr 21, Sophie Fisher marked it as to-read Jul 14, BookDB marked it as to-read Sep 26, Leonardo added it Nov 13, Alexander marked it as to-read Apr 10, Marco marked it as to-read Jun 23, Jordan Walters added it Sep 26, Loren Spahiu marked it as to-read Nov 26, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
About Henry E. Henry E.
Modern European Philosophy: Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment
Books by Henry E. Trivia About Kant's Theory of No trivia or quizzes yet. Welcome back. This book constitutes one of the most important contributions to recent Kant scholarship. In it, one of the pre-eminent interpreters of Kant, Henry Allison, offers a comprehensive, systematic, and philosophically astute account of all aspects of Kant's views on aesthetics.
The first part of the book analyses Kant's conception of reflective judgment and its connections with both empirical knowledge and judgments of taste. The second and third parts treat two questions that Allison insists must be kept distinct: the normativity of pure judgments of taste, and the moral and systematic significance of taste. The fourth part considers two important topics often neglected in the study of Kant's aesthetics: his conceptions of fine art, and the sublime.
To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to. To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply cambridge.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Note you can select to send to either the free. Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service. Book summary views reflect the number of visits to the book and chapter landing pages. Login Alert. Log in. Get access Buy the print book. Check if you have access via personal or institutional login.
Actions for selected content:
Log in Register. Cited by. Crossref Citations. This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef. Cazeaux, Clive Kant and Metaphor in Contemporary Aesthetics. Kantian Review, Vol. Dunagan, Colleen Dance, Knowledge, and Power. This freedom [i. Imagine that you can do what you so desire. Generally, if individuals enjoy such freedom, they will not sacrifice it, even though it is savage freedom. An Iroquois called La Plaque … lived among the French for several years.
He was even made a lieutenant in our [French] army, in order to induce him to remain with us, as he was a very brave man. He could not however hold out, and returned to his own nation.
New France was ceded to Great Britain in Kant might have mistaken a period of the French army for that of the English army. Crusoe does not decide to voyage to a desert island. Still, this passage from an anthropology lecture anticipates section 2 of Critique of the Power of Judgment in that both relate the savage to a Crusoe.
Kant's Theory of Taste : A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic (NoDust) | eBay
In his Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime , he states the following:. A person of calm and self-interested industry does not even have, so to speak, the organs to be sensitive to the noble feature in a poem or in a heroic virtue; he would rather read a Robinson than a Grandison. Here, Kant evokes the Puritan work ethic exemplified in Crusoe, rather than his solitude on a desert island. Robinson Crusoe on his island, deprived of the help of his fellowmen, without the means of carrying on the various arts, yet finding food, preserving his life, and procuring a certain amount of comfort; this is the thing to interest people of all ages, and it can be made attractive to children in all sorts of ways….
At the time this book was widely read, including by Kant.
Cookies and Privacy
Rousseau is mistaken here. The Old Robinson Crusoe has plenty of tools and instruments, which he saves from the wreck of a ship; whereas the New Robinson Crusoe has nothing but his head and his hands to depend on for his preservation.
- A Kantian Theory of Sport.
- Codice di pratica professionale per il restauro delle fronti esterne degli edifici - 1 (Italian Edition).
- Æ - Reading Matters - William Morris’s Philosophy of Art.
First, Crusoe is negatively regarded as a person who is deprived of taste. The Iroquois who are thought to express the dawn of civilization contrast with a castaway Crusoe who comes before the process of civilization:. If a human being were wholly alone on an island, then he would choose not according to taste but rather according to appetite. Thus only in the community of others [ Gemeinschaft Anderer ] does he have taste. Second, a Crusoe is therefore cleared of vanity and luxury.
To be self-sufficient, hence not to need society, yet without being unsociable, i. This leads to a further question: Is such a Crusoe the epitome of benevolent misanthropy?
Who gives way with affect to an ideal that surely cannot be attained is enthusiastic…. Such a person shuns people not due to malicious intent, because he cannot tolerate them, but because he can nowhere find such people the way he would like them, no such people so grateful, so benevolent toward the whole human race.
He is thus a virtuous fantast, he pursues the ideal with affect…. For Kant, Rousseau exemplifies a benevolent misanthrope, and it is, to my mind, via Rousseau that a Crusoe is as a benevolent misanthrope.